How we got the dirtiest stream in America

Date

1971 SPRING

Authors

ECKHARDT B

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

THE HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL IS POLLUTED BY BOTH INDUSTRY AND THE CITY OF HOUSTON. ALTHOUGH A JOINT CITY-COUNTY POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM WAS INITIATED IN 1953, IT FAILED BECAUSE THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTS FAILED TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL SUPPORT. HOUSTON'S OWN SEWAGE PLANTS WERE PRIMARY POLLUTION CONTRIBUTORS. VARIOUS INDUSTRIES ALSO CAUSED MUCH OF THE POLLUTION. TEXAS COURTS, HOWEVER, HELD THAT A CORPORATE EXECUTIVE COULD NOT BE LI SUBORDINATE MAY HAVE ACTUALLY BEEN RESPONSIBLE. THEY ALSO HELD THAT CORPORATIONS CANNOT BE CRIMINALLY PROSECUTED. HENCE, CORPORATIONS WERE FREE TO POLLUTE AT WILL. LEGISLATION WAS PROPOSED TO CORRECT THIS SITUATION, BUT IT WAS EMASCULATED THROUGH EFFECTIVE LOBBYING AND AMENDMENTS. THE TEXAS POLLUTION CONTROL ACT WAS FINALLY PASSED. IT CREATED A CONTROL BOARD COMPOSED OF MEMBERS REPRESENTING POLLUTING INDUSTRIES. THE FEDERAL POLLUTION PROGRAM HAS ALSO BEEN INEFFECTIVE, BUT PROSECUTIONS HAVE RECENTLY BEGUN UNDER THE REFUSE ACT. HOUSTON ITSELF HAS AN ENCOURAGING NEW ALTHOUGH STATE ACTION IS STILL INEFFECTIVE. AMENDMENTS TO STATE LAW AND REVISED FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS ARE NEEDED. (HART-FLORIDA)

Description

VOL-28

Keywords

*CITIES, *POLLUTION ABATEMENT, *Texas, *WATER POLLUTION CONTROL, ADMINISTRATION, ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES, ADMINISTRATIVE WATER POLLUTION, Cities, FE GOVERNMENT, Houston, Houston Ship Channel, Industrial wastes, INDUSTRIES, JUDICIAL *HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, LEGAL ASPECTS, LEGISLATION, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, POLLUTION, REGULATION, RIVERS AND HARBORS ACT, STANDARDS, STATE GOVERNMENTS, SW 3070 Water quality control, SW 4050 Water law and institutions, Texas, Washington, WATER, Water pollution sources, water pollution treatment, Water quality, WATER QUALITY CONTROL, WATER QUALITY STANDARDS

Citation