Texas Water Digital Library

Evaluating the effects of low impact development on Texas A&M University West Campus

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.creator Rose, Katie
dc.creator Hodges, Ben R.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-04-14T15:08:46Z
dc.date.accessioned 2011-12-12T22:57:59Z
dc.date.available 2011-04-14T15:08:46Z
dc.date.available 2011-12-12T22:57:59Z
dc.date.created 2010-12
dc.date.issued 2011-04-14
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2152/10897
dc.description.abstract The west campus of Texas A&M University is located in the White Creek watershed and has experienced increases in urbanization in recent years. This urbanization has dramatically impacted White Creek, including bank erosion from higher runoff volumes and peak flows. This study uses HEC-HMS and SWMM models to evaluate the effectiveness of low impact development (LID) and best management practices (BMP) in lowering runoff volumes and peak flows on the Texas A&M Campus. The LID techniques evaluated were green roofs, rainwater harvesting and pervious pavements and the BMP evaluated was a detention pond. A new metric, the Hydrologic Footprint Residence, developed by Giacomoni and Zechman (2009) is used for further comparison. HFR incorporates the quantity of flow from a storm with the cross sections of the stream to determine the flood area. This flood area is plotted with respect to time and the area under the curve represents the HFR, in area-time. The LID and BMP technologies were applied to the watershed and evaluated using 77 historical precipitation events. A set of 10 representative storms were used for analysis. In general, the scenario that was the most effective in lowering the peak flow, runoff volume, and HFR of the storm was the combination of rainwater harvesting and pervious pavements. The detention pond was shown to effectively lower the peak flow for larger storms, but does not change the runoff volume of any storm. The LID techniques were shown to be more effective in reducing the impacts of urbanization for small storms. The results also gave insight into the importance of the precipitation intensity and duration. The importance of the Antecedent Moisture Condition of the soil is evaluated in the second part of the study. The AMC was found to have an impact on the peak flows with AMCIII (saturated soil) resulting in the highest peak flow for each storm event and AMCI (dry soil) resulting in lowest peak flow. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Center for Research in Water Resources, University of Texas at Austin
dc.relation.ispartofseries CRWR online report;2010-08
dc.subject White Creek en_US
dc.subject HEC-HMS en_US
dc.subject SWMM en_US
dc.subject low impact development en_US
dc.subject stormwater en_US
dc.subject urbanization en_US
dc.subject Antecedent Moisture Condition en_US
dc.title Evaluating the effects of low impact development on Texas A&M University West Campus en_US
dc.type Technical Report en_US
dc.description.department Research in Water Resources, Center for en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
CRWR online report 10-08.pdf 1.600Mb application/pdf View/Open
CRWR online report 10-08.pdf.txt 70.63Kb text/plain View/Open
license.txt 1.698Kb text/plain View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account