An assessment of presentism

Show simple item record


dc.contributor.advisor Menzel , Christopher en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMember Boas , Harold en_US
dc.creator McDaniel , Brannon David en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2004 -09 -30T01 :40 :32Z
dc.date.accessioned 2014 -02 -18T22 :28 :03Z
dc.date.available 2004 -09 -30T01 :40 :32Z
dc.date.available 2014 -02 -18T22 :28 :03Z
dc.date.created 2003 -05 en_US
dc.date.issued 2004 -09 -30T01 :40 :32Z
dc.identifier.uri http : / /hdl .handle .net /1969 .1 /29
dc.description.abstract There is a debate in the philosophy of time over the status of non -present entities . Do these things exist , and if so , what sorts of things are they ? Recently , the debate has split into two groups , presentists and eternalists . Presentists hold that no past or future things exist now . Socrates does not now exist , though he did in the past ; my future daughter does not now exist , though she may in the future . Ontologically , the present is distinct , serving to demarcate all that currently has existence . As far as the eternalist is concerned , all entities - whether past , present , or future - are equally real . If it was , is , or will be , it can be found in the eternalist picture of time . As such , there is no distinct present at which some entities exist while others do not ; rather , everything enjoys the same ontological status . I will be concerned to offer an assessment of the presentist view . Common objections against presentism will be examined , amplified , and answered where appropriate . I will not examine the arguments in favor of the presentist view . Rather , I wish to describe why it is that the eternalist feels compelled to deny presentism . Ultimately , my goal will be to show that although presentism survives some of the current objections raised against it , it does not survive them all . Presentism is an interesting , but ultimately unsatisfactory view . There is a modified form of presentism (call it presentism* ) that can meet the objections raised against the original position , and after noting some of the objections raised against presentism , I will sketch the outlines of presentism* in some detail . I intend to show that presentism* is able to retain what is most valuable about presentism , while also withstanding certain objections that the latter view could not . en_US
dc.format.extent 207113 bytes
dc.format.medium electronic en_US
dc.format.mimetype application /pdf
dc.language.iso en _US en_US
dc.publisher Texas A &M University en_US
dc.subject time en_US
dc.title An assessment of presentism en_US
dc.type Book en
dc.type.genre Electronic Thesis en_US
dc.type.material text en_US
dc.format.digitalOrigin born digital en_US

Citation

An assessment of presentism. Available electronically from http : / /hdl .handle .net /1969 .1 /29 .

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search

Browse